Companies Experience Pushback on Return-to-Office Mandates
In the gradual aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, global organizations such as Meta and Snap are undergoing a shift in their stance regarding remote work arrangements. These companies are currently conveying a new directive to their workforce: the moment has come to resume office-based work.
Naturally, the directives for a return to the office (RTO) are not being met with enthusiasm by employees. From conflicting communication to a dearth of information supporting the decision to bring employees back to the physical office, it’s easy to see why workers are pushing back on this 180-degree change in organizational direction.
Employees are pushing back—and for good reason
From tech giants to top online retailers, organizations worldwide are seeing just how much employees value remote work. These are some of the top reasons why remote workers are pushing back on RTO mandates:
An RTO mandate can threaten work-life balance
Remote work allows employees to balance their work and personal lives by helping them regain control of their time and energy. When working remotely, employees don’t have to deal with the challenges of commuting to and from work. Having the extra time gives workers the opportunity to do other life-enriching activities, from cooking their own meals to trying out new hobbies.
Abruptly asking employees to return to the office may disrupt the balance employees have cultivated since starting remote work. This sudden change threatens to impact workers’ well-being and cause stress, which will cause concern for employees.
Logistical and financial challenges
Remote workers have the freedom to live away from city centers or business districts. They can live in areas where rent and cost of living can be more affordable, allowing them to manage their finances better. Remote work also eliminates the need for long commutes to and from the office. A remote work setup gives employees more control over their time and finances. This means they have more resources to spend on the things and people they love.
If these remote workers are forced to transition to 100% onsite work, they may need to choose between long commutes or uprooting and moving back to busier, more expensive cities where most companies are located. Both options are time-consuming and costly, so it’s understandable why employees are demanding their companies to reconsider.
Poor or no communication
Another top reason why RTO policies are receiving negative reactions from workers is the way mandates are being communicated. Mandates without proper dialogue with workers can come out to be one-sided. At the same time, the lack of consideration for policy changes can rub employees the wrong way. And when the manner of communication makes employees feel like their integrity and quality of work are being put into question, they will react accordingly.
Aside from receiving pushback, organizations can also observe low employee morale in the wake of such policy changes. This is especially true in cases where management does not engage in discussions with their workers. Disregarding the importance of employer-employee dialogue can cause employees to feel like management does not value their well-being and opinions.
Flexibility is still essential
Some companies have successfully implemented their versions of post-pandemic work policies with very little pushback. For example, Smucker’s, an American food and beverage manufacturer, considered different factors like collaboration, employee engagement, and flexibility. They implemented a more flexible policy where employees can work from anywhere for the majority of the year. However, they require employees to report onsite during core weeks.
While it’s nowhere near a fully remote work setup, this strategy was met with limited resistance from the employees. This acceptance can be largely attributed to the fact that the approach helps achieve management’s aim to foster in-person connection and collaboration without fully sacrificing employees’ flexibility.
The need for empathetic and transparent leadership
Implementing any change in policy is not without its challenges. However, there are solutions that can minimize the negative impact of making such changes. The “my way or the highway” approach won’t work, especially in this always-evolving workplace. If organizations want to boost morale and keep employees engaged, a thoughtful and empathetic approach to implementing policy changes is in order.
Additionally, leadership must be transparent and truthful. If you want your employees to be fully onboard, it’s only essential to give them reasons to do so. Sharing resources, providing realistic timelines, offering a platform for discussion and compromise, and aligning on business goals are excellent ways organizations can practice transparency.
Consider different perspectives and options
Remember: going back to the office is not the only option. The benefits of remote work still exist even when the worst of the pandemic is behind us. A business can still have a fully functioning, collaborative, and productive team even when working remotely. Employees who have been working from home over the past few years know this, and, to some degree, so do business leaders. That’s why there are people who reject the RTO mandates and would rather find other career opportunities than go back to the office full-time.
But if a company does decide to pull the plug on a fully remote work setup, the next step is to ensure that all options have been considered. Employers should also be truthful and empathetic in the decision-making process. Aside from thinking only of the company’s bottom line, leaders must fully assess what’s best for their employees, customers, and stakeholders. This way, they will have covered all their bases and can confidently defend their choice of post-pandemic work setup.
Discover all the ways remote staffing can move your business forward! Book a free business consultation with our Growth Experts today.